Common LAW ESSENTIALS

You are not a person FFS...

In 1862 the legal definition of "person" in the UK was changed to mean a "corporation". There was a very good reason for this, and it involves contracts, status and jurisdiction. Corporations can only contract with each other and not with a living man or woman.

The Government is a corporation, as are the local council, the police, the utility companies, and the banks. So, at a stroke the Government changed the rules and made us all de-facto members of the UK Corporate Society, subject to their regulations.

We are deemed to have contracted unless we rebut that presumption. Once you realise this, you can act to take back control of your affairs and demand an equitable contract with full disclosure of the terms and conditions.

For more information on this have a look at the video "You are not a person" on the Useful websites page.

Scenario Walk-through

So how do you deal with people or agents (people who are acting as a representative for a corporation) who are attempting to get you to do something you do not want to do? (this could be literally anything, say a ticket, arrests, entering a building, taking your property, and so on)

Well, first they typically will ask if your name is _____.

I recommend not answering this with a Yes in any form. The reason is because doing so is a demonstration of consent, or agreement. What you can say instead is:

“That is my person. However you can call me ____”

What this does is make you an agent and lawfully separates you from your person. From that moment onward you then stand as a [wo]man above any jurisdiction they may claim over you, as an agent of the corporation. They ask for your name in this manner because they want you to “act” as your person and not as a [wo] man, whether they do this knowingly or not. For when you are a person you fall within their jurisdiction and they can act in a more free manner, even if it infringes upon your unalienable rights, those of the people. You can also say before responding to their question:

“Before proceeding, please identify yourself and your purpose of being here.”

By law, as a public servant they are required to identify themselves. Should they fail to do so, you have every right to not engage with them in any manner. Beyond that if they should infringe upon your rights and act as if there is a contract, even if you mistakenly agreed to one, that contract will be deemed as null and void in a court of law. Ultimately, if they continue in any manner without a legal contract (I will specify the criteria later on), they make themselves, as agents ([wo]men), and the corporation liable should any laws be broken, or they trespass against you or your property.

Be aware that by asking for your name they are inviting you into a contract, that is if they aren’t being aggressive about it (I will touch more on how to deal with this later). This is because in order to do anything they must have a contract, or consent, in some form or another.

At any point to ensure no contract has been implied you can state this simple and easy phrase:

“I will not contract with you. I do not consent. I will not answer any of your questions.”

By doing this you deny them being able to act as if there is a contract of any kind, even if it means leaving behind a piece of paper, which you can deny them as well. Should they attempt to proceed as if there is a contract state to them:

“Do not ______ (enter my property, leave any documents, touch my body, touch my property, or whatever else they may be attempting and you would not like them to do)”

You are also free to demand they tell you what they are doing or attempting to do. Again they must openly tell you, if they don’t and act in a manner that assumes there is a contract it makes them and the corporation liable.

Another powerful tool is to place the burden of proof on their shoulders. This can be done a variety of ways via asking questions and/or denying any of their statements. For denial, this simple maxim explains it perfectly, “He who affirms, not he who denies, must bear the burden of proof.” This is taken from “A Collection of Legal Maxims” by S. S. Peloubet, a widely recognized book from the Harvard Law library, a link to it is provided in the Legal Maxims section.

How you place the burden of proof is via a statement of denial or by asking questions. If this is directed to a [wo]man and there is no contract and no trespass has been committed, they are not required to respond. However, if they are a public servant, acting as an agent, they are obligated to respond. This is because to act with secrecy in any form is to no longer be in the public, which cannot be done when a [wo]man is in the uniform of a corporation, like that of the government. All things done in the public must be done openly with full transparency. Whoever fails to do so accepts responsibility as a [wo]man, this also includes those acting as directors, with the corporation also being liable.

Some great questions to ask any [wo]man who is acting in their public capacity:

“By what right do you claim i as your property?”

“By what right you claim jurisdiction over _____?”

“Do you have a verified claim proving i caused harm to my fellow [wo]man?”

“Is there a contract whereby i, as a [wo]man, am placed under your jurisdiction?”

“By what right do you claim ownership over ____?”

Denial is quite simple as it can be done at any moment during a scenario. It is a matter of saying no and stating clearly what you would not like the other individual not to do.

It is important to note, should there be any confusion during the scenario, it is the responsibility of the party who is confused to demand clarification. Should the [wo]man acting in the private not like to clarify, or it not be required of them (like in the case where there was no contract to begin with), they have no obligation to do so. Any [wo]man acting in their public capacity is always obligated to provide clarification so long as it pertains to their public duties and obligations.

Keywords

Agent - a [wo]man who is acting on behalf of a corporate entity, corporation, or another [wo]man.

Person - a corporate entity the exists in the public domain. Can be natural (connected to a living [wo]man) or dead (in care of another while the living [wo]man is incapacitated, often the corporate government).

Public - anything to do with corporate activities that serve the people and their property. Everything in this domain must provide a service, or be in service of the people. This includes all government activity.

Private - anything associated to living [wo]men and their personal lives/property.

Property - anything that is owned, inherited or created.

Contract - legal or lawful demonstration of agreement. Can also be called Consent or an Agreement. Legal is between corporations. Lawful is between [wo]men. Can be implied or explicit. Implied means that there is assumed consent until it is rebutted or denied. Explicit means it has been openly stated consent has been given. Will be discussed in greater detail later on in this document.

Civil Law - a codified system of law that pertains to only corporations or corporate entities. Contains citizens (also known as persons) but not people.

Common Law - laws of the Land, Air, Water (Property/Real, Trust/Equity, Maritime/Civil) that are common to an individual or a group of people. Also known as laws of the provable self evident world, the laws of the mind, and the laws of the emotions which make up natural law. Will be discussed in greater detail later on in this document.

Law - in essence it is a truth defined and clarified

Documentation/evidence - anything you create that confirms any claims you may make. I highly recommend you record and document everything you can. Having clear abundant evidence strengthens your claim and ability to protect yourself or your property. It will also help prove a trespass has occurred and you can receive reparations for the damage caused.

Ownership - If you created it, or inherited it, you may claim ownership. Your identity, person, and anything that which you create is your rightful property. No one may change, alter, or claim ownership without the approval by you. In some cases, there is shared ownership, in the case of this planet and that which exists naturally, in which case all parties are responsible for the care of said property. Furthermore, no one [wo]man may claim it as their property because it is shared by all. This also applies to the public, which is the property of all [wo]men. Divisions can created so as to simply help in placing responsibility of care to a given [wo]man or group. However, this must be in the benefit of all who inherited the property, as is the case with earth.

Claim - a statement/declaration made by a [wo]man. If it is “verified” it means it has sufficient evidence to make it undeniable or irrefutable, this can be achieved through documentation or witnesses.

Argument - a dispute between corporate entities or corporations that requires a mediator.

Trespass - when a [wo]man harms or damages the property of another. Harm can occur physically, emotionally, mentally.

Repairs/Reparations - an action taken to correct any trespass and damaged that has been committed. This can take many forms but the most common is through the payment of an invoice, the value of which is determined by the one trespassed against. In determining the value be sure to make it as verifiable as possible. When in the case of something priceless, such as life energy or time or mental well being, the amount should be sufficient to allow you to repair any damage caused. Intentionality is crucial in determining the appropriate value, IE. what do you intend on doing to repair the damage.

Notice - A document stating to another party, whether a [wo]man or a corporate entity, of a trespass that has been committed. This includes evidence of the trespass, cost of repairs, a demand to cease, and costs should any further damage be caused.

Demand - a notice used to require a party to provide something. Has often been used to require a party to prove the existence of a contract, claims of ownership, or by what right they take action.

Declaration - in essence a statement of claims. This can be used to declare the ending of a contract (and the reasons why), that a trespass has been committed (with supporting evidence), or a claim of ownership (with supporting evidence). Other forms exist however most common ones have been provided. See resources for a link to jeeseonthebrink, where a sample declaration/demand has been provided.

Right - freedom or liberty to do something.

Duty/Obligation - a requirement to fulfill an accept term of a contract or agreement. In terms of the public, anyone who as in the public has the duty to act in the benefit of the people, so long as it does not affect their ability to enjoy their own private life. However, to end a duty or obligation the [wo]man step down from the role they had agreed to act as.

[wo]man - used to refer to both women and men in the shortest and simplest way. Is interchangeable between either sex and is intended to be inclusive of all who are among the living.

Contracts

It is important to note that a contract can only be created between like parties. Essentially what this means is a [wo]man can only contract with another [wo]man and not with any corporate entities. Likewise, a corporate entity can only contract with other corporate entities and not with [wo]men. This is why each and every [wo]men have a person that they are agents for. In essence, this person is their public identity that serves as a vehicle for commerce to be able to interact with the creations of other [wo]men in the public. As a brief side note, there are also private creations and forms of commerce, however they are conducted differently than ones in the public, in this document I will only be discussing those in the public.

Implied Consent Contracts

These are the weakest and easiest contracts to challenge in a court of law. This is because the burden of proof is on the party implying consent has been given. The moment you deny consent, or state consent has not been given, they cannot proceed with the contract any further, doing so would make them liable for any damage caused. Also, you can demand proof of consent. Doing this requires the other party to provide proof of consent being given before proceeding further with the contract.

It is important to note, that if you continue using the services, or product, being exchanged in the contract this is an act of implied consent. Therefore if you intend to end the contract or demand proof of consent be sure you do continue using the service afterwards. A great way to think of it is as a relationship, if you want the relationship to end you stop participating in it as if it still exists. This is where it is important to comprehend boundaries and how to uphold them, though this is too large of a topic to discuss here.

Legal Criteria for explicit contracts

1. Parties competent to contract

Whether between [wo]men or between corporate entities, both parties must be of a standing where they are able to contract. This could be that they are of a certainly maturity, financially capable, or any other criteria demonstrating competence depending on the contract. There should also be no other pre-existing contracts with other parties that may conflict with the new contract, if there is, the other contracts must be resolved first.

2. Free and genuine consent

There must be no form of deceit or manipulation of any kind. Should any be revealed this makes the party who was deceitful liable for any damages cause as a result. This also mean if a party uses force or coercion of any kind the contract is null and void, making the forced party not liable for any damages.

3. Full disclosure

Both parties must openly disclose all pertinent elements of the contracts, such as any conflicting pre-existing contracts, the purpose of the contract, desires and intentions, and any other criteria that may be important to disclose to ensure both parties are making an informed decision.

4. Valuable consideration

There must be something of value exchanged. No one-sided contracts can exist, this would not make it a contract. Both parties must exchange something of value to the other party, whether time, money, or property.

5. Certainty of terms

Terms must not change without notice or mutual agreement regarding any changes made. They must also be clearly defined so as to remove any potential confusion regarding what is being exchanged.

6. Meeting of the minds

Essentially, a demonstration that both parties are in agreement

7. Autograph or Signatures

Autograph is for a [wo]man and Signature is for a person or corporation.

8. Privity of contracts

Parties must have the right or privilege to the property being exchanged. This can be done whether by ownership or transference of power to act on one’s behalf.

Any contract can be ended the moment any party states there is not an agreement. However, in order to be lawfully/legally enforceable there must be clearly stated reason as to why it is to be ended. This is where clear communication is important as the it will strengthen any standing that is being taken.

In the context of a notice or declaration, by providing evidence alongside the statements made can become verified, and therefore irrefutable.

Legal Maxims

Taken from the book “A Collection of Legal Maxims” by S. S. Peloubet which was found in the Harvard Law Library (see link below)

7. Things do not change ownership when captured by pirates and robbers.

12. Expect from others the same treatment that they receive from you.

55. The acts of a servant in which he is usually employed, is considered the act of his master.

27. External actions show the secret intentions.

32. An action does not make one guilty, unless the intention be bad.

53. An act itself does not make one guilty, unless done with guilty intent.

59. An admiralty court has no jurisdiction over those questions which are determined by the common law.

76. Equity is a kind of perfect reason which interprets and amends the written law comprehended in no code, but consistent with reason alone.

15. He who affirms, not he who denies, must bear the burden of proof.

44. The burden of proof lies with the plaintiff.

118. Parties both acting and consenting, are liable to the same punishment.

155. The owner of a thing should fix his price upon it.

224. Cease to reign, if you do not wish to adjudicate.

235. Charters are called “muniments” and “muniendo” because they fortify and defend the inheritance.

260. No man is punished for his thoughts.

60. It is the duty of the justices to administer justice to everyone seeking it from him.

259. The performing of one duty excuses the non-performance of another.

277. Some agreements are odious, but mostly those against matrimony and commerce.

287. Legal conscience is founded upon the law.

290. Consent constitutes law.

294. To consent a thing is to perform it.

331. The law never permits anything contrary to the truth.

339. The touching of property not one’s own, with the intention to steal, is theft.

370. That which, when given through mistake, can be recovered back, when given with knowledge of the facts, becomes a gift.

429. Laws assist the deceived, not the deceiving.

457. Delays in law are odious.

459. Discretion is to know through law what is just.

473. By fraud or dole a contract perishes.

478. Deceit is an artifice, since it pretends one thing and does another.

479. Deceit and fraud shall excuse or benefit no man.

480. Deceit and fraud should always be remedied.

481. Wrongful intention is presumed against one engaged in an unlawful act.

512. Those things which, by way of commendation, are stated at sales, if they are openly apparent, do not bind the seller.

Further Resources

If you would like to further your knowledge of common law here is a collection from others who have created their own documents to help others learn.

Copy of the document “Living in the Private” https://cryptpad.fr/file/#/2/file/QwA6qNfoDQ+IrRu+BCsMOiG6/ Link to the blog “Living in the Private” https://livingintheprivate.blogspot.com/p/home.html

A great simple template to help you create any documents https://jessonthebrink.com/declaration-of-fact-to-reserve-your-rights/

A man known as Christopher James, who has done incredible work helping this knowledge be shared far and wide https://awarriorcalls.com

This document was created by Joshua, @S0v3r31gntyR1s1ng on telegram

For more info like this please join:

https://t.me/CommonLawEssentials https://t.me/awarriorcalls